
Employee benefits have shifted dramatically in recent years. The perks that dominated workplace culture a decade ago - office games rooms, free breakfast, branded merchandise - no longer hold the same appeal in 2025.
What employees value today reflects deeper changes in how people approach work, career development, and long-term financial security. Understanding these priorities matters for organisations serious about retention.
The statutory minimum pension contribution sits at 8% total, with employers contributing at least 3%. That's not enough for most people to retire comfortably.
Employees increasingly understand this reality. They're looking for employers who contribute 10%, 12%, or even 15% for longer-serving staff. These aren't token gestures - they're meaningful investments in people's futures that actually accumulate into something substantial over a career.
Higher pension contributions signal that an organisation thinks beyond immediate productivity and considers employees' long-term wellbeing. For younger workers particularly, this matters more than it might seem, given uncertainties around state pension age and accessibility.
The UK statutory minimum is 28 days including bank holidays. Most professional roles offer at least 25 days plus bank holidays, but some organisations go further.
Thirty days annual leave plus bank holidays makes a genuine difference to people's ability to actually rest, travel, or handle life admin without constant time pressure. Holiday buy schemes offer flexibility for those who value additional time off.
What matters as much as the allocation is whether people can actually take it. Cultures where using full holiday allowance triggers questions or where people feel pressured to stay connected during leave undermine the benefit entirely. The policy means nothing without permission to genuinely disconnect.
Statutory maternity leave provides some income, but it drops significantly after the first six weeks. Many families struggle financially during this period, which creates stress precisely when new parents need support.
Enhanced maternity pay - full salary for six months rather than statutory minimums - removes financial pressure from what's already a challenging time. Equally important is proper paternity leave. Two weeks statutory doesn't reflect how families actually function or what modern fathers want from early parenting.
Organisations leading on this offer extended paternity leave at full pay, genuine shared parental leave options, and support for adoption, surrogacy, and fertility treatment. These policies recognise that families form in different ways and all deserve backing. Companies understanding how benefits shape the employee experience know this creates loyalty that lasts years.
People want to keep learning and developing throughout their careers. Access to training, courses, conferences, and qualifications matters for both immediate performance and longer-term career progression.
Meaningful development budgets - £1,000-2,000 annually per person - with reasonable autonomy about how to use them demonstrate genuine investment in growth. This might cover professional certifications, industry conferences, relevant courses, coaching, or learning resources.
The alternative is development "opportunities" that require extensive approval processes, only cover directly job-related training, and get deprioritised whenever budgets tighten. That approach signals that employee development is nice-to-have rather than fundamental to how the organisation operates.
Different people need different things. Someone in their twenties without dependents has different priorities than someone in their forties with children. A person training for endurance events values different support than someone caring for elderly relatives.
Flexible benefits let people allocate budget across options that actually matter to them - additional holiday purchase, cycle-to-work schemes, gym memberships, childcare vouchers, tech schemes, season ticket loans. This recognises that one-size-fits-all packages work brilliantly for some whilst being largely irrelevant to others.
The best schemes provide genuine choice without being so complex that people can't understand their options or so limited that the flexibility is mostly theoretical.

Financial stress affects work performance and general wellbeing. Organisations addressing this provide access to financial planning advice, debt management support, and salary sacrifice schemes that create genuine savings.
Season ticket loans help people spread commuting costs rather than finding thousands upfront. Emergency loans or salary advances provide safety nets during unexpected hardship. Some companies offer employee ownership schemes or profit-sharing arrangements that create stake in organisational success beyond monthly salary.
These provisions acknowledge that financial security matters to people and that supporting it benefits everyone - reduced stress, better focus, stronger loyalty to employers who demonstrate they care about more than extracting productivity.
Employee Assistance Programmes offer starting points, but comprehensive mental health support goes further. Extended access to therapy, counselling services that actually address ongoing needs rather than just crisis intervention, and mental health days treated as legitimate sick leave all matter.
Training managers to recognise mental health challenges and respond appropriately creates environments where people feel safe seeking help. Organisations serious about this embed mental health support throughout their culture rather than treating it as separate from "real" business concerns.
The return on this investment shows up in reduced absence, better performance, and retention of talented people who might otherwise leave due to burnout or inadequate support during difficult periods.
Benefits addressing everyday friction often matter more than flashier perks. Season ticket loans. Cycle-to-work schemes. Electric car schemes. Emergency childcare support. These remove obstacles that create constant low-level stress.
The parent who has backup childcare when school closes unexpectedly. The person who can afford an annual travel pass through interest-free loans. Someone cycling to work on a bike they could actually afford through salary sacrifice. Small accommodations that accumulate into significant quality-of-life improvements.
These aren't glamorous enough to lead recruitment campaigns, but they're what people remember when deciding whether to stay or leave.
Benefits packages need examining for equity. Do part-time workers get proportional access? Do lower-paid employees benefit from salary sacrifice schemes, or do these primarily help higher earners? Are benefits designed around traditional family structures or do they accommodate diverse situations?
At scarlettabbott, our job is helping organisations create better working environments - and we regularly help clients review whether benefits actually serve all employees or inadvertently create two-tier workforces.
People rarely cite specific benefits when explaining why they stayed somewhere for years - unless those benefits were particularly good or notably inadequate.
The organisations retaining talent offer benefits that reduce friction, demonstrate genuine care for employee wellbeing, and create conditions where people can build sustainable careers. They remove barriers between work and life rather than creating them.
These benefits aren't exciting recruitment marketing material. They're the infrastructure that lets people actually stay, grow, and contribute without constantly being stressed about money, health, family, or future security. That's what matters.